Join me and one of my fellow nerds, as we talk Christine (both book and movie), as well as some of the other happenings in the world of The Master!
Join me and one of my fellow nerds, as we talk Christine (both book and movie), as well as some of the other happenings in the world of The Master!
Come and check out your favorite nerd, live on the podcast known as Dark Tower Radio, where I palaver with a fellow nerd on King, horror, book, Dark Tower and all kinds of good stuff!
And yeah, I may sound even more nerdy live than on here…who knew???
Once upon a time, there was man known as Uncle Stevie.
Uncle Stevie liked to tell scary stories.
There were bad guys in Uncle Stevie’s stories. Lots of bad guys.
He told a story about a town that was invaded by vampires.
But Uncle Stevie was not a bad man. No, not at all.
In fact, Uncle Stevie had children of his own. But those children could not read his stories, because they were children, after all. Uncle Stevie did not know what to do. He couldn’t scare his own children, but he wanted to write something they would like and not be scared of. Uncle Stevie thought for a long time.
One day, Uncle Stevie got an idea. He decided to write a fairy tale of sorts, and dedicate it his daughter, Naomi. Excited, Uncle Stevie got to work right away and wrote his new story. It took him a long time, but he finally finished writing the story.
Uncle Stevie decided to call this new story The Eyes of the Dragon. And his children were happy, since he finally wrote a story that they could read, and they liked it.
The story was actually sort of a fairy tale, although it was kind of long for a fairy tale.
But it read like a good fairy tale: there were kings and queens. And princes. And even an evil sorcerer. And the story took place in a magical land, far, far away.
Although it was fairy tale, you could still tell that this story was written by Uncle Stevie. There were some parts that were kind of scary, but not as scary. And people did some bad things in the story, but never got punished like they would in a regular fairy tale.
In other words, The Eyes of the Dragon was a fairy tale, but you could tell it was written by the guy who writes scary stories.
And like Uncle Stevie’s other books, The Eyes of the Dragon would suck you right in to the land of princes and evil sorcerers, if you weren’t careful. So kids liked it, and so did the grown-ups.
This nerdy grown-up decided she wanted to feel like a kid again. So she read The Eyes of the Dragon this month. Once again, she was captivated. And enchanted.
Just like reading any other book written by Uncle Stevie.
So, here is her recap and review of The Eyes of the Dragon. As always, watch out for the fierce beasts known as Spoilers!
The book introduces us to man named Roland. Roland is the king of a land called Delain. Roland is not hated in Delain, although he is not loved either. Most people think that Roland is a competent king, and have no strong feelings towards him, one way or the other.
Roland is not a very bright man, and relies on the advice given to man by a man known as Flagg. Flagg is Roland’s trusted adviser, and is also a man familiar with magic and its various uses. There are many who do not quite trust Flagg, but no one dares to cross his path, as most people actually fear him.
At nearly 50 years old, Roland is still single, and this must be remedied, so that he can bear a son who will take over his royal duties one day. Flagg introduces Roland to many women, and eventually, a woman named Sasha marries Roland. Sasha is only 17 when she marries Roland, and is inexperienced in the ways of men.
Roland is also inexperienced in the ways of women, and has trouble bedding Sasha. However, she becomes pregnant with the couple’s first child, Peter. Peter is handsome and well liked, and takes after his mother. Peter’s favorite toy is a dollhouse that was a gift to his mother. The dollhouse is intricate and even has working parts, such as a small stove that heats up. Peter spends hours playing with this dollhouse, making up fantastical stories to go along with it. Peter also shows leadership skills at an early age, as he is able to exert his influence over people. One day, Peter is able to prevent the unnecessary death of a horse. Naturally, Flagg notices this and becomes uneasy.
Queen Sasha is well loved by the people of Delain, and is able to influence Roland when he makes certain decisions. She also insists upon making sure that Peter is taught manners and etiquette. Specifically, she makes sure that Peter uses his napkin, no matter the circumstances. This is a lifelong habit that becomes ingrained in Peter.
Eventually, Sasha becomes pregnant with the couple’s second child, Thomas. Flagg distrusts Sasha, and plots to kill her. He is successful in accomplishing this when Thomas is born, as he convinces Sasha’s midwife to sever a vital artery, so that Sasha dies from blood loss.
As Peter grows older, Flagg distrusts him more and more. He realizes that if Peter were to become King, Flagg may be vanquished from Delain. After much thought, Flagg decides to kill King Roland and pin the death on Peter, so that Thomas will become King. Thomas lives in the shadow of his brother, as he is not handsome and smart like Peter, but is more like his father. Since Thomas is feeling neglected, this makes it easy for Flagg to exert his influence over Thomas.
One autumn night, Flagg poisons a glass of wine and gives it to King Roland, who drinks the wine, not suspecting that anything is amiss. While this is happening, Thomas is spying on his father by peeking through the head of Niner, a dragon slain by his father on a hunting expedition. Thomas feels that something is amiss, but does not say anything.
Flagg plants evidence in Peter’s room that will be found after his father’s death. Roland does not show any signs of illness for a few days, but dies a sudden, painful death.
Shortly after the death of Roland, preparations are made for the coronation of Peter as king of Delain. However, the preparations are halted after Dennis, the royal butler, finds the evidence planted by Flagg in Peter’s room. Peter is then tried and convicted for the murder of his father, and Thomas is crowned king of Delain.
Thomas is reluctant, but accepts his new title, but feels guilty for his complacence in his father’s death and the false accusations against his brother. In the meantime, Peter is imprisoned in a tower known as Needle. His cell is several stories off the ground.
Within a week of his imprisonment, Peter makes two demands: that his mother’s old dollhouse be brought to him, and that he receive a napkin with every meal. Peter sends a message to Anders Penya, the Judge General of Delain, with this demand. With the help of Ben Stadd, Peter’s best friend, Anders is able to grant these requests.
Ben Staad stands by Peter in claims of innocence, and refuses to to believe that his friend could have committed such as act. Even Anders Penya, who had questioned Peter in regards to the murders, begins to have his doubts in regards to Peter’s guilt.
The dollhouse is finally delivered to Peter, and he begins receiving his napkins at each meal. Peter then removes a few threads from each napkin, and begins to weave a rope using the miniature loom in the dollhouse. It is painstaking work, but Peter is patient, and spends the next five years making this rope so that he may escape his prison. Peter also finds an old locket and letter one day, and realizes that Flagg has been spreading his evil throughout the kingdom of Delain for several centuries.
In the meantime, Thomas attempts to rule over Delain as king. However, he is a very unpopular king, as he has raised taxes on the kingdom, due to advice from Flagg, whom he has become dependent on. Thomas is very unhappy and moody, due to the fact that he is not ready for the responsibilities as king, and the guilt over his father’s death.
One night, Thomas sleep-walks to his secret hiding spot, and re-enacts the night of his father’s death in his sleep. This is witnessed by Dennis, Thomas’ royal butler. Dennis is badly frightened by what he sees, and begins to question King Roland’s death.
A few days later, Dennis pays a visit to Anders Peyna, and tells his tale. Peyna becomes distressed, realizing that he has falsely imprisoned Peter, the true king of Delain.
The next morning, Peyna sends Dennis back to Delain, advising him to be careful. Peyna then heads north to the camp of the exiles, where many have fled to escape the situation in Delain. Peyna plans to seek the help of Ben Staad, Peter’s old friend. The Staad family are among those who have fled Delain.
Since Dennis is able to read and write, Peyna tells him to send a note to Peter in secret. Dennis writes the note, and hides it among the napkins, in the hope that the note will reach Peter.
Peyna also speaks to Ben Staad, and sends Ben back to the kingdom of Delain to help Peter. Ben is accompanied by a woman named Naomi Reechul, who drives a sled pulled by Husky dogs. With Naomi’s help, Ben reaches the former home of Peyna. In order to track down Dennis, Naomi has Frisky, one of her dogs, track Dennis’ scent, in the hopes that they may find him.
In the meantime, Peter has finished weaving his rope and plans his escape from Needle. However, he has second thoughts when he receives Dennis’ letter, which states that Peyna does not believe Peter is guilty of murder and was in fact wrongfully imprisoned.
Peter re-thinks his plans to escape the next night, and uses his blood to write a note to Dennis. He bundles it in a napkin, in the hopes that Dennis will find it.
Dennis lurks outside The Needle and catches a glance of Peter. He also finds the note, and decides that he will do anything to help Peter.
Ben and Naomi are able to track down Dennis, with the help of Frisky. The three then exchange stories, and make plans to rescue Peter.
That night, Flagg finally realizes that Peter means to escape, and begins to head up the stairs of Needle, to Peter’s cell. Peter hears Flagg coming, and using his rope, begins to make his escape.
As he is making his escape, Peter’s rope breaks. However, his fall is cushioned by a pile of napkins, which were loaded into a cart by Ben, Naomi and Dennis. Peter falls, but survives, much to the anger of Flagg.
Flagg then chases Peter and his friends to the former chambers of King Roland. Flagg says that he will kill Peter. Peter then confronts Flagg with the knowledge of the murder of his father, along with Flagg’s past evil deeds.
Thomas then appears, with his father’s bow and arrow. Flagg believes Thomas to be the ghost of Roland, which makes him forget about his plans to murder Peter. This allows Thomas to shoot Flagg with his father’s bow and arrow. The arrow then hits Flagg in the eye. After he is hit by the arrow, Flagg vanishes, leaving only his clothes behind.
After the confrontation with Flagg, Peter is acquitted of his father’s murder. Peter invites Thomas to stay in Delain, but Thomas declines. Instead, Thomas says that he will spend his life tracking down Flagg, so that he may avenge his father and brother. Dennis offers to accompany Thomas, and Thomas gratefully accepts the offer.
Thomas leaves Delain, and it is not known if he ever returns, although he did have many strange adventures. Peter continues to rule in Delain as king, and Ben and Naomi eventually get married.
Well, I did say that I wanted a break from the scary stuff.
In other words, I needed a break from watching Indianapolis Colts football!
Haha, just joking! Even though the Colts are frightening to watch at the moment, I will still be loyal to them!
But seriously, The Eyes of the Dragon though…
The Eyes of the Dragon is a fairy tale. And it is a fairy tale written by the King of Horror.
And…wait for it…
It is actually a good fairy tale written by The Master! Who knew?
Ok, it’s confession time…I hope all
both of the readers of this blog have some tolerance and don’t judge me…
For many years, I put off reading this book. There was something that just did not sit right with me, in regards to this book.
In my little mind, Sai King was not supposed to write fantasy children’s stories (although this one does have some adult themes, more about that later.) He was supposed to write about the scary hotels, rabid St. Bernards, possessed vehicles, cursed burial grounds and all those other things that have kept me up at night over the years.
In other words, there was no room for princes, evil wizards and faraway kingdoms. Absolutely not allowed!
Well, as one might say in another faraway land created by King, “I cry your pardon.”
I finally read The Eyes of the Dragon a couple of years ago. And I enjoyed it then.
And when I re-read it this year, I was again reminded of what I had missed out on, due to my obstinate nature.
While The Eyes of the Dragon is not in my top 10 (too many others overshadow it), I still consider it to be one of King’s underrated gems.
The Eyes of the Dragon could be considered to be a children’s tale. And in many ways, it is. My parents read me fairy tales when I was child, and I was constantly reminded of those when I was reading this book.
There is land that is far, far away, aka the kingdom of Delain. King never specifies just where Delain is, but it is not on any map that exists in this world.
There are kings, queens and princesses. King Roland, Queen Sasha and Prince Peter are almost “textbook” fairy tale characters if you will. They are well loved by the people they rule over, and strive to the right thing.
And there is an evil wizard. Flagg fits the bill of evil wizard perfectly: he is a scheming, evil and ultimately prideful creature who does his best to wreak havoc wherever he goes (again, more about Flagg later.)
However, like almost all of King’s books, there is more than meets the eye (pun not intended) in The Eyes of the Dragon.
First of all, there is King Roland. Now, I am not calling King Roland necessarily a bad guy, because he does try to do what is right.
However, King Roland is DEFINITELY not a bright man. And time and time again, his actions remind of that fact. Usually, it is the bad guys in fairy tales that are bumbling buffoons, not the good kings who want to do what is right. But Roland is an exception in this book, and this actually makes the book more interesting, and adds a little depth to the story.
Then there is the character of Thomas, aka Thomas the Tax Bringer, whom I actually find to be one of King’s most fascinating characters.
On the one hand, Thomas appears to be a bad dude. When the narrator described how Thomas killed a dog because….well, just because, I immediately felt the need to go home and hug my dogs (luckily, they are the tolerant sort and don’t mind random hugs, unlike my cats, who revel in blood sport.)
But, on the other hand, I would agree with the narrator: Thomas is not a bad boy. Repeat: Thomas is not a bad boy.
Now, Thomas may have done some pretty bad things. Killing that dog, for instance. And watching Flagg murder his father and not saying a word about that to anyone.
However, some of Thomas’ actions are understandable.
Thomas was basically screwed from the moment he came into existence. When he was born, his mother died. Even though that was not his fault, Thomas (and possibly others) blamed his birth on the death of his mother. So he had to carry that guilt.
Then there is the fact that Thomas is the brother of Peter. Growing up, it was my brother who had friends and was the musician. I was just the awkward nerd that no one else noticed. So of course, this created resentment with me, just as Thomas resented his brother, even though he did love Peter, as I love my brother. Being in someone’s shadow and never being noticed for your accomplishments (and Thomas was actually a good archer) is difficult, and can be pretty depressing. Thomas only wanted the approval of his father, and not getting it made him understandably upset.
So, while some of Thomas’ actions were deplorable, at least they were understandable, given the context. I don’t think that Thomas was an inherently evil character. In fact, there is only one inherently evil character in this book. We will talk about him in a bit.
One thing I love about The Eyes of the Dragon is that it is a fairy tale. It tells of fantastical lands, kings and queens, magic, evil wizards and all that good stuff.
I also love that The Eyes of the Dragon is a Stephen King book.
So, Captain Obvious strikes again, right?
Well, let me explain a bit.
What I mean is that I love fantasy and fairy tales. When I was a child, my parents had to constantly read to me from various books of fairy tales and fantasy stories, as they were my favorite. We read Peter Pan. We read the non- Disney version of Pinocchio (seriously, my parents wonder where my horror obsession comes from. Read that one sometime. It is far more disturbing than most “horror” stories.)
So, I feel at home when I read those types of stories. They are my bread butter, you might say. George RR Martin, JRR Tolkien, Anne McCaffrey and Madeleine L’Engle are just a few of my favorite authors. The land of fantasy is my home.
But, despite the fact that The Eyes of the Dragon appears to be a fairy tale, it was written by the King of Horror. And throughout the book, we are constantly reminded of that fact.
For one, The Eyes of the Dragon has some gruesome deaths. Gruesome deaths are Sai King’s bread and butter, after all. The death of Queen Sasha definitely counts as gruesome, as a mid-wife used a knife to cut a vital organ so that Sasha would bleed to death. Not only is this gruesome, this is also one of the most tragic deaths I have ever come across in any book.
Speaking of gruesome, there is the death of King Roland. Roland is poisoned, but not with just any poison. No, only “Dragonsand” would do for Roland. This was a poison that burned someone from the inside out…shudder.
Most fairy tales end on “happily ever after.” The evil is defeated, and justice is somehow served. However, this is not the case in regards to The Eyes of the Dragon.
For one, Flagg is not defeated. Sure, he exits the kingdom of Delain, but he still alive! And read to make mischief wherever he can. Seriously, I wonder if he found the world of The Stand because he got evicted from Delain? Seems legit, right?
There is also Thomas. I did say that Thomas was not a bad guy. But he was also complicit in the murder of his father and imprisonment of his brother. However, Thomas never faces any consequences for his actions, and basically leaves the kingdom in shame, although he leaves under the guise of doing something noble, aka tracking down Flagg so that Flagg can answer for his actions (wish I could find out how that worked out, actually.)
In other words, Thomas did not get a happy ending. The only one who really got a happy ending was Peter, and maybe his friend Ben. And Peter probably spent years trying to clean up the mess made by Flagg and his brother, so I am really not sure how happy his ending really was.
Ok, I saved the best for last.
Or is it the worst for last? Maybe best of the worst for last?
In case you haven’t figured it out yet, I am talking about that bad guy that we all love to hate…
Can I get a round of loud booing for…
None other than Randall Flagg himself!
Now, Randall Flagg is ubiquitous in the Stephen King universe.
He shows up, in one way or another, in so many different books. And he seems to be the equivalent of the cockroach in the King universe: he just won’t go away!
Or perhaps the equivalent of Von Miller: a one man (or maybe one demon) wrecking crew who is impossible to game plan for. Instead of see “Miller, V,” we have see Flagg, R.
Flagg is perhaps most associated with the novel The Stand. A world has been ravaged by the super flu and trying to rebuild itself. Of course, with no help from Flagg, R.
The Stephen King cockroach also makes several appearances in the Dark Tower series (both the books and the comics.) In fact, he is part of the best opening line in history: The man in black fled across the desert, and the gunslinger followed.
(Again, see Flagg, R.)
And he is also a character in The Eyes of the Dragon.
Out of all the different flavors of Flagg (kind of gross if you think of it that way, actually), I think that his character in The Eyes of the Dragon is my favorite flavor. Not that I don’t think he’s great in all the other books, but there is just something about him in The Eyes of the Dragon that makes my heart go pitter-patter…
For one thing, he is pretty creative in this particular book. I mean, a poison called Dragonsand? Talk about a different, painful kind of death on the person you inflict it on!
He also has the old school, evil wizard feel to him in The Eyes of the Dragon.
He is crafty, cunning and enjoys evil for the sake of…well…evil. There is no other way to put it. We, as readers, tend to like to assign motivations to characters, to give them a reason for their actions.
Well, there is no reason for Flagg’s actions in The Eyes of Dragon. He is a bad guy who enjoys being a bad guy. He does evil things because he likes it. He only feels remorse when his plans fail and he is unable to unleash chaos like he wants to. He garners no sympathy from the reader. In fact, the reader roots for him to die, and is disappointed when he doesn’t (one of the perks of being an evil wizard includes the ability to perpetually exist and stir up trouble everywhere, even breaking the inter-dimensional barrier.)
So it’s refreshing, actually.
Almost as refreshing as glass of wine that includes that extra touch of Dragonsand…
So, that’s it for The Eyes of the Dragon!
Join me next month as we return to the “real world…”
In other words, I will be reviewing and dissecting an oldie but goodie, otherwise known as The Shining.
Tune in next month…same bat time, same bat channel!
Although it takes place in the “faraway” land of Delain, there are indications that The Eyes of the Dragon is indeed a part of the Stephen King universe. Here are some of the connections that I found:
-The most obvious connection to King’s other books is the character of Randall Flagg. Flagg appears in several other King works, including The Gunslinger, Wizard and Glass, The Dark Tower, The Stand, The Wastelands, The Wind Through the Keyhole and even in the title story of the collection Hearts in Atlantis. Flagg apparently possesses the ability to travel to other worlds, and can perhaps even travel through time.
–In The Drawing of the Three, Roland speaks of an encounter with Thomas and Dennis, while they are on a quest to find Flagg. It is not known if Thomas and Dennis are ever able to confront Flagg and force him to answer for his crimes against Delain. In fact, it is doubtful if their quest was ever successful, and it is more likely that this quest eventually results in the deaths of both Thomas and Dennis.
-King Roland shares a first name with with Roland Deschain, the main character in King’s Dark Tower series. However, this is all the two share, as Roland Deschain is clever and skilled, unlike his Delain counterpart.
-Peter’s time in The Needle can be said to be similar to Andy Dufresne’s imprisonment in Shawshank State Prison in the novella Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption (part of the collection Different Seasons), as Andy was also imprisoned for a crime that he did not commit. Like Peter, Andy Dufresne also spent years devising and ingenious escape plan, under the noses of his captors.
-Randall Flagg owns a two-headed parrot. Parkus, the man responsible for law and order in the Territories in the novels Black House and The Talisman, also owns a similar creature. It is unknown if these creatures are one in the same, or merely just similar.
-Mention is made of Rhea of the Coos. Rhea is a major character in the novel Wizard and Glass, as well as The Dark Tower comics.
In life, sometimes you take journeys. Sometimes these are physical journeys (I have had a few myself).
Sometimes, there are other kinds of journeys as well…
Well, I am sure most of us (me included) don’t take a journey like that often
ever but that game last night sure was was ride, at any rate…whew! And this little old blog sends you love, Ser Peyton!
Or, if you are more like me, you take literary journeys. Oh, too nerdy for you! Well, sorry, guess someone forgot what blog this was again!
And I have traveled alone, and I have traveled with others. Now traveling alone is not a bad thing. But sometimes, having a companion has its advantages. A Sam Gamgee, maybe. Or if you are Peyton Manning, a Von Miller (and it doesn’t hurt to perhaps throw in a Chris Harris, or maybe an Aquib Talib or two, for that matter).
In other words, great journeys are not usually accomplished alone, whether they are to destroy a pesky ring, or to obtain a pesky second (Super Bowl) ring. Even this guy can testify to that!
Yes, you are definitely reading this blog and forgot to heed all the previous warnings!
Reading the Dark Tower series is a journey. And I have taken that journey on my own. And it was great, of course.
But I have taken it with friends, too.
Well, I wasn’t talking about these guys, per se. If I was relying on them for friendship, well that is a recipe for guaranteed heartbreak, and I will leave it at that.
Nor am I talking about the followers on my blog and social media account, who were with me every step of the way in my latest re-read and review of the entire series. I do appreciate
both all of you very much though, and much love to everyone!
Rather, I am talking about works such as this one:
And this one:
Well, they may be books, but to any Constant Reader who is also obsessed with the Dark Tower series, they are almost as invaluable as a Sam Gamgee or Vonn Miller. They aid in the journey, so that journey becomes that much richer. These books have also made me become a much better reader, as I have picked out some details I missed on previous re-reads, which made me feel like the kid who found the Easter Egg that everyone else missed because everyone else did not know where to look.
Recently, I have the please of talking to one of the creators of my companions, aka Bev Vincent. I was curious as to what goes on when creating works like these to aid in this journey that I have taken so many times. And Mr. Vincent was gracious enough to talk to me, and given me a little more insight into his work, the Stephen King universe in general and the world of our friendly neighborhood gunslinger. So, read below for the complete interview.
And, as always:
Please, tell us a little about yourself. This can be anything, including education, background, etc. Also, when did you first become a Stephen King fan and why?
I come from eastern Canada. I grew up in a small community in northern New Brunswick, where I lived until I was eighteen. I then went to Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, where I studied chemistry. I got a B.Sc in 1983 and finished my PhD in X-ray crystallography in the fall of 1987. I did a postdoc at the ETH in Zurich and worked as a staff crystallographer until 1989, at which time I moved to Texas, where I’ve lived ever since.
I started writing seriously at the end of the previous millennium and it has been part of my daily routine ever since, although I still have a day job.
I discovered Stephen King when I was living in Halifax. I picked up a copy of ‘Salem’s Lot in a used bookstore and I’ve been hooked ever since. I sought out his other books (there weren’t many in 1979!) and have followed along with him for over 35 years. I read a lot, and far more than just King’s books, but he’s been one of the constants. I guess you could call me a Constant Reader.
What is your favorite Stephen King book, and why is it your favorite?
I have a hard time picking absolute favorites — I have affinities for certain books at different times for different reasons. I have a particular fondness for ‘Salem’s Lot because it was the first, the one that got me hooked. The book has a lot going for it, for a “second” novel (of course, we know it was not his second written book), and it stands up quite well.
Bag of Bones is one that would appear in my top five list. It was the first of his books that I read in first draft manuscript long before it was published. That was a fascinating experience, and I especially appreciated the way he subsequently rewrote the book, layering in things that weren’t present in the first draft.
I used to like to tell people about The Gunslinger for a long time, when people didn’t know much about it. It was my entry point into the Dark Tower series, but for a long time it was the only book in the series for me. I loved its mood. I had no idea where the series was headed — or even that it was headed somewhere, but I reread that one a number of times. I could list others that are high on my list. But I’d have an easier time picking my two least favorites. No trouble there at all!
Oh, what is your least favorite SK book?
I have two: Needful Things and The Tommyknockers. I didn’t like any of the characters in the former and I liked Bobbi and Gard a lot in the latter and hated that King abandoned them for a huge chunk of the book when all I wanted to do was to get back and find out how they were doing.
I am really excited about the upcoming Hulu adaptation for 11/22/63, and I have high hopes for the series. However, I know that movie adaptations of King’s books are mixed, at best. Some work, some don’t. Out of all the King movies, which one do you feel works the best, and why? Which one do you think does not work, and why?
I’ve already seen the entire miniseries of 11.22.63 and I think people are going to like it a lot. It is significantly different from the novel in many ways, yet it captures the sense of the book perfectly. The actress who plays Sadie is wonderful and it is her more than James Franco who gives this adaptation its heart. The production values are extremely high and the cast is terrific.
I’ve never been someone who saw the adaptation as a necessary part of the life cycle of a book. Slavish adaptations aren’t always the best. The problem with Dreamcatcher, in my opinion, is that it tried to cram too much of a very big book into the movie, which made it almost incomprehensible to people to people unfamiliar with the novel.
I also visited (the set of) Haven for a day with my daughter, which was great fun. There’s a case of an adaptation that took a core idea and then ran off in a vastly different direction from the source. The same people did the same thing with The Dead Zone TV series.
I have read your book, The Dark Tower Companion, and wow! Can you tell us how this book came to be, and exactly what went in to writing it and putting it together?
I previously wrote The Road to the Dark Tower around the time King was finishing up the last three books in the series. People had frequently asked me when I was going to write a book about King and his work, but I had resisted the idea because it seemed like such a huge project.
Then when I heard that King was going to write the final three Dark Tower books all at once, I had the idea that I could explore the series and, in doing so, say something about all of King’s work in general. King gave me the manuscripts for the final books a couple of years before they were published, which allowed me to have my book ready around the same time as Book 7 was published.
The Road to the Dark Tower was written for people who had already read the entire series and wanted to revisit it with me. I would be the tour guide, and I would point out the things I had noticed while reading and rereading and studying the series.
Then, a number of years later, the first serious indications that there would be a film adaptation emerged, with Ron Howard and Akiva Goldsman. I thought it was time to update my book with all the things that had happened in the Dark Tower Universe since my first book was published. However, my publisher suggested that I do a new book, completely different from the first. So, The Dark Tower Companion was written for people who haven’t necessarily read the series. I thought there would be people who came to the Dark Tower via the movies or the Marvel graphic novels. People who might want to know more about something — a reference book. I had to read the series several times for each book, with different things in mind on each reading. My copies are marked up with so many different colored highlighters that they look like the Bends o’ the Rainbow!
I especially enjoyed getting to interview all these great people for the book, from King himself to Ron Howard (from the set of RUSH) and Akiva Goldsman, and then all of the creative people involved in the Marvel series. That was a series of terrific experiences. I also had a great time coming up with the two maps — the one that showed the known region of Mid-World, especially when certain details came together, and the one of the Dark Tower locations in Manhattan.
It looks like we may finally get our Dark Tower movie(s). I know that if Roland doesn’t do the finger twirl in the movie, I will not watch it…at all! (Joking, joking.) All kidding aside, what do you need to see in the movie(s) from the books (since we all know that there will be changes, which are necessary) to make sure that the movie does not stray too far from the source material?
I’m open to a complete re-imagination of the series. If you’ve read my interviews with Howard and Goldsman, you’ll see that their ideas for the first movie are quite radical, and I was fine with that. I’m also fine with possibly having Idris Elba as Roland — in fact, I think that would be terrific.
A movie isn’t made first and foremost for the readers of the source material, I believe. They are made for a movie-going audience, so a lot of accommodations have to be made, and can be made.
Some people have suggested that the movies should feature Roland’s NEXT version of his quest, the one where he starts of with the Horn of Eld. To my mind, that means that anything could happen. Anything. If Roland is a different person (arguably a slightly better one), then maybe he needs different companions to get the job done. I’m not saying I want to see that happen, but once that suggestion is made, it shows that people are open to change.
I don’t know if the movie can work if it is too literal an adaptation. A lot of people were upset by how the series ended on the page — can you imagine going to see a handful of movies over a span of years only to end up back at the beginning again?
I’m perfectly content for them to do whatever they see fit with the adaptation. There are some pretty smart people in the movie business. And if they end up making a hash of it, oh well.
So many thanks to Bev Vincent for this interview. And remember, if you need a companion to help guide you on the Path of the Beam, whether it be be your first journey or your 19th journey, please check out The Road to the Dark Tower, The Dark Tower Companion and Stephen King’s The Dark Tower: A Complete Concordance (written by the lovely Robin Furth). These
friends works are available wherever books are sold.
And, as always, happy reading!